Re: [RFC PATCH RESEND 0/3] mm modifications / helpers for emulated GPU coherent memory

2019-03-21 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 07:51:16PM +, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Hi, Jérôme, > > Thanks for commenting. I have a couple of questions / clarifications > below. > > On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 09:46 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 01:22:22PM +, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > >

Re: [RFC PATCH RESEND 0/3] mm modifications / helpers for emulated GPU coherent memory

2019-03-21 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Hi, Jérôme, Thanks for commenting. I have a couple of questions / clarifications below. On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 09:46 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 01:22:22PM +, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > > Resending since last series was sent through a mis-configured SMTP > > server. >

Re: [RFC PATCH RESEND 0/3] mm modifications / helpers for emulated GPU coherent memory

2019-03-21 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 01:22:22PM +, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Resending since last series was sent through a mis-configured SMTP server. > > Hi, > This is an early RFC to make sure I don't go too far in the wrong direction. > > Non-coherent GPUs that can't directly see contents in

[RFC PATCH RESEND 0/3] mm modifications / helpers for emulated GPU coherent memory

2019-03-21 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Huang Ying Cc: Souptick Joarder Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" Cc: linux...@kvack.org Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org Resending since last series was sent through a