On Tue, 23 May 2023, Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2023, Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> clang with W=1 reports
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:6012:3: error: unannotated
>>   fall-through between switch labels [-Werror,-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
>>                 case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
>>                 ^
>>
>> Only one case and the default does anything in this switch, so it should
>> be changed to an if-elseif.
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> If I wanted to fix this quickly, I'd just add the break in there.

I've just applied [1] doing this.

I'm still open to the cleanup suggested below, if you're up for it.


BR,
Jani.


[1] 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230524-intel_async_flip_check_hw-implicit-fallthrough-v1-1-83de89e37...@kernel.org

>
> If I wanted to fix this properly, I'd add a function
> modifier_supports_async_flips() or something, and replace the switch
> with:
>
>       if (!modifier_supports_async_flips(i915, 
> new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier)) {
>               drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "[PLANE:%d:%s] Modifier does not 
> support async flips\n",
>                       plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name);
>               return -EINVAL;
>       }
>
> But I wouldn't just replace the switch with if-elseif. It doesn't help
> with the overall feeling that intel_async_flip_check_hw() is too long.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 14 +++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index 0490c6412ab5..1f852e49fc20 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -5994,8 +5994,7 @@ static int intel_async_flip_check_hw(struct 
>> intel_atomic_state *state, struct in
>>               * Need to verify this for all gen9 platforms to enable
>>               * this selectively if required.
>>               */
>> -            switch (new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier) {
>> -            case DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR:
>> +            if (new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR) {
>>                      /*
>>                       * FIXME: Async on Linear buffer is supported on ICL as
>>                       * but with additional alignment and fbc restrictions
>> @@ -6008,13 +6007,10 @@ static int intel_async_flip_check_hw(struct 
>> intel_atomic_state *state, struct in
>>                                          plane->base.base.id, 
>> plane->base.name);
>>                              return -EINVAL;
>>                      }
>> -
>> -            case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
>> -            case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED:
>> -            case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED:
>> -            case I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED:
>> -                    break;
>> -            default:
>> +            } else if (!(new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == 
>> I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED ||
>> +                         new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == 
>> I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
>> +                         new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == 
>> I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED ||
>> +                         new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == 
>> I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED)) {
>>                      drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
>>                                  "[PLANE:%d:%s] Modifier does not support 
>> async flips\n",
>>                                  plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Reply via email to