Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/rect: Keep the clipped dst rectangle in place

2019-11-22 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 07:11:38PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 05:43:40PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 06:25:12PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > Now that we've constrained the clipped source rectangle such >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/rect: Keep the clipped dst rectangle in place

2019-11-21 Thread Benjamin GAIGNARD
On 11/20/19 6:11 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 05:43:40PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 06:25:12PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: >>> From: Ville Syrjälä >>> >>> Now that we've constrained the clipped source rectangle such >>> that it can't have

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/rect: Keep the clipped dst rectangle in place

2019-11-20 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 05:43:40PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 06:25:12PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > Now that we've constrained the clipped source rectangle such > > that it can't have negative dimensions doing the same for the > > dst

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/rect: Keep the clipped dst rectangle in place

2019-11-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 06:25:12PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Now that we've constrained the clipped source rectangle such > that it can't have negative dimensions doing the same for the > dst rectangle seems appropriate. Should at least result in > the clipped src and