Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 1/3] drm: Add separate state structure for legacy, non-KMS drivers

Hi Emil Am 25.02.20 um 18:37 schrieb Emil Velikov: > Hi Thomas, > > On Tuesday, 25 February 2020, Thomas Zimmermann > wrote: > > Non-KMS drivers store state in struct drm_driver. This bloats the > structure for KMS drivers and prevents it from being declared

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 1/3] drm: Add separate state structure for legacy, non-KMS drivers

Hi Thomas, On Tuesday, 25 February 2020, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Non-KMS drivers store state in struct drm_driver. This bloats the > structure for KMS drivers and prevents it from being declared with > 'static const' qualifiers. Moving the non-KMS state into a separate > data structure

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 1/3] drm: Add separate state structure for legacy, non-KMS drivers

Hi Am 25.02.20 um 17:06 schrieb Ilia Mirkin: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:59 AM Thomas Zimmermann > wrote: >> >> Non-KMS drivers store state in struct drm_driver. This bloats the >> structure for KMS drivers and prevents it from being declared with >> 'static const' qualifiers. Moving the

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 1/3] drm: Add separate state structure for legacy, non-KMS drivers

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:59 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Non-KMS drivers store state in struct drm_driver. This bloats the > structure for KMS drivers and prevents it from being declared with > 'static const' qualifiers. Moving the non-KMS state into a separate > data structure resolves