Eric Anholt writes:
> I'd prefer to see sbc stay with its current name, since that's its name
> in the specs we're trying to implement (GLX_OML_sync_control,
> GLX_INTEL_swap_event). If you drop the rename from the patch,
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt
Sounds good.
> I read that as "SBC is incr
Keith Packard writes:
> The easy part is turning on the extension, now that the X server has a patch
> to send the events.
>
> The only trick was making sure the Present extension reliably provided the
> right 'sbc' count back in the event, and that's done by making sure the sbc
> count is always
The easy part is turning on the extension, now that the X server has a patch
to send the events.
The only trick was making sure the Present extension reliably provided the
right 'sbc' count back in the event, and that's done by making sure the sbc
count is always the same as the sequence number th
