On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 5:27 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 10-10-2019 18:59, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:28 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>
> >> Bail from the pci_driver probe function instead of from the drm_driver
> >> load function.
> >>
> >> This avoid /dev/dri/ca
Hi,
On 10-10-2019 18:59, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:28 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
Bail from the pci_driver probe function instead of from the drm_driver
load function.
This avoid /dev/dri/card0 temporarily getting registered and then
unregistered again, sending unwanted add
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:28 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Bail from the pci_driver probe function instead of from the drm_driver
> load function.
>
> This avoid /dev/dri/card0 temporarily getting registered and then
> unregistered again, sending unwanted add / remove udev events to
> userspace.
>
>
Bail from the pci_driver probe function instead of from the drm_driver
load function.
This avoid /dev/dri/card0 temporarily getting registered and then
unregistered again, sending unwanted add / remove udev events to
userspace.
Specifically this avoids triggering the (userspace) bug fixed by this