On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 21:49, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 03:30, Koenig, Christian
> wrote:
> >
> > Am 17.04.19 um 17:51 schrieb Emil Velikov:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > On 2019/04/17, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>
On 2019-04-18 12:35 p.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> - We've implemented rendernodes as a clean/new uapi years ago. git
> says we've made them the default in 2014.
>
> - Lots of work happened to make render nodes the main thing. Despite
> all that effort (well over 5 years, and a few more, initial
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:04 PM Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> On 2019-04-18 11:46 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:22 AM Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> On 2019-04-18 11:11 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:52 AM Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2019-04-18
On 2019-04-18 11:46 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:22 AM Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 2019-04-18 11:11 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:52 AM Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 2019-04-18 10:26 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> Ok correction: amd has
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:22 AM Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> On 2019-04-18 11:11 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:52 AM Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> On 2019-04-18 10:26 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ok correction: amd has stuck out in the past too, there was some vblan
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:56 AM Koenig, Christian
wrote:
>
> Am 18.04.19 um 10:26 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:06:03AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> >> Am 18.04.19 um 08:46 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 7:30 PM Koenig, Christian
> >>> wrote:
>
On 2019-04-18 11:11 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:52 AM Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 2019-04-18 10:26 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok correction: amd has stuck out in the past too, there was some vblank vs
>>> pageflip stuff where we needed to do some pretty clever tr
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:52 AM Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> On 2019-04-18 10:26 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > Ok correction: amd has stuck out in the past too, there was some vblank vs
> > pageflip stuff where we needed to do some pretty clever tricks to both
> > have the new stricter semantics
Am 18.04.19 um 10:26 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:06:03AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Am 18.04.19 um 08:46 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 7:30 PM Koenig, Christian
>>> wrote:
Am 17.04.19 um 17:51 schrieb Emil Velikov:
> Hi guys,
>
On 2019-04-18 10:26 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> Ok correction: amd has stuck out in the past too, there was some vblank vs
> pageflip stuff where we needed to do some pretty clever tricks to both
> have the new stricter semantics for everyone, while keeping the amd ddx
> happy still. This aint
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:06:03AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 18.04.19 um 08:46 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 7:30 PM Koenig, Christian
> > wrote:
> >> Am 17.04.19 um 17:51 schrieb Emil Velikov:
> >>> Hi guys,
> >>>
> >>> On 2019/04/17, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On
Am 18.04.19 um 08:46 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 7:30 PM Koenig, Christian
> wrote:
>> Am 17.04.19 um 17:51 schrieb Emil Velikov:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> On 2019/04/17, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 17.04.19 um
Hi guys,
On 2019/04/17, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > Am 17.04.19 um 14:35 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:06:32PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> > > > Am 17.04.19 um 14:00 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > > > On
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 7:30 PM Koenig, Christian
wrote:
>
> Am 17.04.19 um 17:51 schrieb Emil Velikov:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > On 2019/04/17, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> >>> Am 17.04.19 um 14:35 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Ap
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 03:30, Koenig, Christian
wrote:
>
> Am 17.04.19 um 17:51 schrieb Emil Velikov:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > On 2019/04/17, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> >>> Am 17.04.19 um 14:35 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Apr
Am 17.04.19 um 17:51 schrieb Emil Velikov:
> Hi guys,
>
> On 2019/04/17, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 17.04.19 um 14:35 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:06:32PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 17.04.19
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 17.04.19 um 14:35 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:06:32PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> > > Am 17.04.19 um 14:00 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:18:35AM +, Koenig, Christian
Am 17.04.19 um 14:35 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:06:32PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Am 17.04.19 um 14:00 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:18:35AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Am 17.04.19 um 13:06 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:06:32PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 17.04.19 um 14:00 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:18:35AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> >> Am 17.04.19 um 13:06 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:29 PM Koenig, Christian
> >>> wr
Am 17.04.19 um 14:00 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:18:35AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Am 17.04.19 um 13:06 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:29 PM Koenig, Christian
>>> wrote:
>>> [SNIP]
>> Well, what you guys did here is a serious no-go.
> Not rea
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:18:35AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 17.04.19 um 13:06 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:29 PM Koenig, Christian
> > wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> well going back to the beginning once more because something doesn't fit
> >> together here.
>
Am 17.04.19 um 13:06 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:29 PM Koenig, Christian
> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> well going back to the beginning once more because something doesn't fit
>> together here.
>>
>> I mean what exactly is the purpose of 8059add0478e "drm: allow render
>> capa
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:29 PM Koenig, Christian
wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> well going back to the beginning once more because something doesn't fit
> together here.
>
> I mean what exactly is the purpose of 8059add0478e "drm: allow render
> capable master with DRM_AUTH ioctls"?
>
> When I read the
Hi guys,
well going back to the beginning once more because something doesn't fit
together here.
I mean what exactly is the purpose of 8059add0478e "drm: allow render
capable master with DRM_AUTH ioctls"?
When I read the code correctly the effect is that we ignore the DRM_AUTH
flag when also
Am 17.04.19 um 10:10 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 09:09:27AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 16.04.19 um 23:40 schrieb Andres Rodriguez:
>>> After a recent commit, access to the DRM_AUTH ioctls become more
>>> permissive. This resulted in a buggy check for drm_master capabil
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 09:09:27AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 16.04.19 um 23:40 schrieb Andres Rodriguez:
> > After a recent commit, access to the DRM_AUTH ioctls become more
> > permissive. This resulted in a buggy check for drm_master capabilities
> > inside radv stop working.
> >
> > Th
Am 16.04.19 um 23:40 schrieb Andres Rodriguez:
After a recent commit, access to the DRM_AUTH ioctls become more
permissive. This resulted in a buggy check for drm_master capabilities
inside radv stop working.
This commit adds a backwards compatibility workaround so that the radv
drm_master check
After a recent commit, access to the DRM_AUTH ioctls become more
permissive. This resulted in a buggy check for drm_master capabilities
inside radv stop working.
This commit adds a backwards compatibility workaround so that the radv
drm_master check keeps working as previously expected.
This fixe
28 matches
Mail list logo
