On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 11:38:44PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:22:27PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 06:30:52PM +0100, Alexandru Gheorghe wrote:
> > > drm_private_state has a back pointer to the drm_atomic_state,
> > > however that was not
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:22:27PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 06:30:52PM +0100, Alexandru Gheorghe wrote:
> > drm_private_state has a back pointer to the drm_atomic_state,
> > however that was not initialized in drm_atomic_get_private_obj_state
> > after duplication, as
Hi,
Thank you for the review.
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:22:27PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 06:30:52PM +0100, Alexandru Gheorghe wrote:
> > drm_private_state has a back pointer to the drm_atomic_state,
> > however that was not initialized in
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 06:30:52PM +0100, Alexandru Gheorghe wrote:
> drm_private_state has a back pointer to the drm_atomic_state,
> however that was not initialized in drm_atomic_get_private_obj_state
> after duplication, as it is the case for other drm atomic getters
>
> Signed-off-by:
drm_private_state has a back pointer to the drm_atomic_state,
however that was not initialized in drm_atomic_get_private_obj_state
after duplication, as it is the case for other drm atomic getters
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1
