On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 7:02 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 2/18/19 2:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:05:46AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> >> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> >> cases where we are expecting to
Hi Daniel,
On 2/18/19 2:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:05:46AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:05:46AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
This patch is part
