On 6/14/19 10:39 AM, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> On 6/13/19 5:49 PM, John Hubbard wrote:
>> On 6/13/19 5:11 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote:
...
>> Actually, the pre-existing code is a little concerning. Your change preserves
>> the behavior, but it seems questionable to be doing a "return 0" (whether
>> via
On 6/13/19 5:49 PM, John Hubbard wrote:
On 6/13/19 5:11 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote:
In nouveau_dmem_pages_alloc(), the drm->dmem->mutex is unlocked before
calling nouveau_dmem_chunk_alloc().
Reacquire the lock before continuing to the next page.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell
---
I found this
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 05:11:21PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> In nouveau_dmem_pages_alloc(), the drm->dmem->mutex is unlocked before
> calling nouveau_dmem_chunk_alloc().
> Reacquire the lock before continuing to the next page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell
> ---
>
> I found this while
In nouveau_dmem_pages_alloc(), the drm->dmem->mutex is unlocked before
calling nouveau_dmem_chunk_alloc().
Reacquire the lock before continuing to the next page.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell
---
I found this while testing Jason Gunthorpe's hmm tree but this is
independant of those changes. I
On 6/13/19 5:11 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> In nouveau_dmem_pages_alloc(), the drm->dmem->mutex is unlocked before
> calling nouveau_dmem_chunk_alloc().
> Reacquire the lock before continuing to the next page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell
> ---
>
> I found this while testing Jason
