Hi Tomeu,
On 5 April 2016 at 16:07, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 4 April 2016 at 17:44, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On 4 April 2016 at 14:55, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>> + if (async) {
>>> + for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
>>> + if
On 4 April 2016 at 17:44, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Tomeu,
>
> On 4 April 2016 at 14:55, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
>> index 3b8f652698f8..8305bbd2a4d7 100644
>> ---
Hi Tomeu,
On 4 April 2016 at 14:55, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
> index 3b8f652698f8..8305bbd2a4d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
> +++
As per the docs, atomic_commit should return -EBUSY "if an asycnhronous
updated is requested and there is an earlier updated pending".
v2: Use the status of the workqueue instead of vop->event, and don't add
a superfluous wait on the workqueue.
v3: Drop work_busy, as there's a sizeable delay