On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:09:21AM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Fine with me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
Thanks for the review, applied to drm-misc-next.
-Daniel
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 4:29 AM Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
>
> > This is used for handling future fences. Currently no
Fine with me.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 4:29 AM Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> This is used for handling future fences. Currently no driver use
> these, and I think given the new timeline fence proposed by KHR it
> would be better to have a more abstract interface for future
This is used for handling future fences. Currently no driver use
these, and I think given the new timeline fence proposed by KHR it
would be better to have a more abstract interface for future fences.
Could be something simple like a struct dma_future_fence plus a
function to add a callback or
