On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 15:12 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andy Walls
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 15:12 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM,
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 15:12 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andy Walls
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls
> >> >
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> >>>
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net
wrote:
On Tue,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> >>>
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >>> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls :
> >>> > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 08:31 -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 01:30 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > It appears to be incorrect. If you send me a copy of the vbios, I can
> > easily add a quirk. I suspect your board oem may offer several boards
> > with different output
[cc'd chris wilson]
Hi Andy!
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:02:30 -0400
Andy Walls wrote:
> BTW, I found that Chris Wilson recently committed a change to inhibit
> all drm connector polling globally for a different reason:
>
>
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls :
>>> > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
>>> >> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls :
>>> >> >
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 11:44 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
> [cc'd chris wilson]
Oops. Thanks!
> Hi Andy!
>
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:02:30 -0400
> Andy Walls wrote:
>
> > BTW, I found that Chris Wilson recently committed a change to inhibit
> > all drm connector polling globally for a
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 01:30 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls
> wrote:
> > In a larger sense it's about user policy for error reporting by the drm
> > and radeon drivers, and error response by both the drivers and the user.
> >
> > In the face of EDID
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls :
>> > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
>> >> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls :
>> >> > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses,
[cc'd chris wilson]
Hi Andy!
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:02:30 -0400
Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net wrote:
BTW, I found that Chris Wilson recently committed a change to inhibit
all drm connector polling globally for a different reason:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 01:30 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net wrote:
In a larger sense it's about user policy for error reporting by the drm
and radeon drivers, and error response by both the drivers and the user.
In the face
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 11:44 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
[cc'd chris wilson]
Oops. Thanks!
Hi Andy!
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:02:30 -0400
Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net wrote:
BTW, I found that Chris Wilson recently committed a change to inhibit
all drm connector polling globally
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
2010/9/20 Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net:
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafał
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 08:31 -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 01:30 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
It appears to be incorrect. If you send me a copy of the vbios, I can
easily add a quirk. I suspect your board oem may offer several boards
with different output configurations and
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls :
> > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> >> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls :
> >> > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or
> >> > polling of "connectors" that have chips
2010/9/20 Andy Walls :
> On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
>> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls :
>> > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or
>> > polling of "connectors" that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus
>> > address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
2010/9/20 Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net:
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2010/9/20 Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net:
DRM KMS
2010/9/20 Andy Walls :
> DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or
> polling of "connectors" that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus
> address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical connector nor EDID EEPROM,
> will create perpetual noise in dmesg and the system log every 10
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls :
> > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or
> > polling of "connectors" that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus
> > address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical connector nor EDID EEPROM,
> >
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 11:52 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:59:00AM -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
> > This change allows the root user to disable (and re-enable) DRM KMS
> > connector polling on a per connector basis via sysfs, like so:
> >
> > # cat
DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or
polling of "connectors" that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus
address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical connector nor EDID EEPROM,
will create perpetual noise in dmesg and the system log every 10
seconds. Currently the user
DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or
polling of connectors that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus
address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical connector nor EDID EEPROM,
will create perpetual noise in dmesg and the system log every 10
seconds. Currently the user has
2010/9/20 Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net:
DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or
polling of connectors that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus
address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical connector nor EDID EEPROM,
will create perpetual noise in dmesg and the
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:59:00AM -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or
polling of connectors that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus
address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical connector nor EDID EEPROM,
will create perpetual noise in
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 11:52 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:59:00AM -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
This change allows the root user to disable (and re-enable) DRM KMS
connector polling on a per connector basis via sysfs, like so:
# cat
2010/9/20 Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net:
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2010/9/20 Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net:
DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or
polling of connectors that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus
address
30 matches
Mail list logo
