On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 4:02 PM Felix Kuehling wrote:
>
> There is a subsequent patch where amdgpu directly calls ttm_pool_init to
> create pools per NUMA node. That will depend on the updated function
> signature.
Then we probably want to take this through amdgpu then.
Alex
>
> Regards,
>
There is a subsequent patch where amdgpu directly calls ttm_pool_init to
create pools per NUMA node. That will depend on the updated function
signature.
Regards,
Felix
On 2023-03-31 15:17, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 2:54 AM Christian König
wrote:
Should I push this to
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 2:54 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Should I push this to drm-misc-next or do we take it through
> amd-staging-drm-next?
I think either way is fine. We can carry it internally as needed for
testing if you want to commit it to drm-misc-next. I don't think
there are any
Should I push this to drm-misc-next or do we take it through
amd-staging-drm-next?
Christian.
Am 30.03.23 um 21:50 schrieb Alex Deucher:
From: Rajneesh Bhardwaj
This allows backing ttm_tt structure with pages from different NUMA
pools.
Tested-by: Graham Sider
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling
From: Rajneesh Bhardwaj
This allows backing ttm_tt structure with pages from different NUMA
pools.
Tested-by: Graham Sider
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling
Signed-off-by: Christian König
Signed-off-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c | 2 +-
