Re: [PATCH] drm/usb: select USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig

2012-08-18 Thread Sachin Kamat
Hi Dave, What is your opinion about this patch? On 15 August 2012 01:27, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:12:22PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> >> In general what you suggested seems to be the right thing to do. >> However in this particular case, making this "depends on" creates

[PATCH] drm/usb: select USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig

2012-08-17 Thread Sachin Kamat
Hi Dave, What is your opinion about this patch? On 15 August 2012 01:27, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:12:22PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> >> In general what you suggested seems to be the right thing to do. >> However in this particular case, making this "depends on" creates

[PATCH] drm/usb: select USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig

2012-08-14 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:12:22PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > > In general what you suggested seems to be the right thing to do. > However in this particular case, making this "depends on" creates > recursive dependencies > and probably that is the reason Dave Airlie decided to make it "select U

[PATCH] drm/usb: select USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig

2012-08-14 Thread Sachin Kamat
On 10 August 2012 19:35, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:00:25AM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> DRM_USB selects USB. However, USB depends on USB_SUPPORT and >> USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD. >> Thus, selecting USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig avoids the following warning >> (detected when DisplayLink wa

Re: [PATCH] drm/usb: select USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig

2012-08-14 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:12:22PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > > In general what you suggested seems to be the right thing to do. > However in this particular case, making this "depends on" creates > recursive dependencies > and probably that is the reason Dave Airlie decided to make it "select U

Re: [PATCH] drm/usb: select USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig

2012-08-14 Thread Sachin Kamat
On 10 August 2012 19:35, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:00:25AM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> DRM_USB selects USB. However, USB depends on USB_SUPPORT and >> USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD. >> Thus, selecting USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig avoids the following warning >> (detected when DisplayLink wa

[PATCH] drm/usb: select USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig

2012-08-10 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:00:25AM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > DRM_USB selects USB. However, USB depends on USB_SUPPORT and USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD. > Thus, selecting USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig avoids the following warning > (detected when DisplayLink was selected using exynos4_defconfig): > > warning: (MOU

[PATCH] drm/usb: select USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig

2012-08-10 Thread Sachin Kamat
DRM_USB selects USB. However, USB depends on USB_SUPPORT and USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD. Thus, selecting USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig avoids the following warning (detected when DisplayLink was selected using exynos4_defconfig): warning: (MOUSE_APPLETOUCH && MOUSE_BCM5974 && MOUSE_SYNAPTICS_USB && JOYSTICK_XPAD

Re: [PATCH] drm/usb: select USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig

2012-08-10 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:00:25AM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > DRM_USB selects USB. However, USB depends on USB_SUPPORT and USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD. > Thus, selecting USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig avoids the following warning > (detected when DisplayLink was selected using exynos4_defconfig): > > warning: (MOU

[PATCH] drm/usb: select USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig

2012-08-10 Thread Sachin Kamat
DRM_USB selects USB. However, USB depends on USB_SUPPORT and USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD. Thus, selecting USB_SUPPORT in Kconfig avoids the following warning (detected when DisplayLink was selected using exynos4_defconfig): warning: (MOUSE_APPLETOUCH && MOUSE_BCM5974 && MOUSE_SYNAPTICS_USB && JOYSTICK_XPAD