Hi,
On Wednesday, 11 December 2019 07:38:29 GMT Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 10.12.19 um 16:11 schrieb Mihail Atanassov:
> > As suggested in [1], the 'dev' field is a bit repetitive, since it 1:1
> > follows the setting and NULLing of the 'encoder' field. Therefore, use
> >
Hi
Am 10.12.19 um 16:11 schrieb Mihail Atanassov:
> As suggested in [1], the 'dev' field is a bit repetitive, since it 1:1
> follows the setting and NULLing of the 'encoder' field. Therefore, use
> drm_bridge->encoder->dev in place of drm_bridge->dev.
>
> [1]
Am 10.12.19 um 16:25 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>
>
> Am 10.12.19 um 16:11 schrieb Mihail Atanassov:
>> As suggested in [1], the 'dev' field is a bit repetitive, since it 1:1
>> follows the setting and NULLing of the 'encoder' field. Therefore, use
>> drm_bridge->encoder->dev in place of
Am 10.12.19 um 16:11 schrieb Mihail Atanassov:
> As suggested in [1], the 'dev' field is a bit repetitive, since it 1:1
> follows the setting and NULLing of the 'encoder' field. Therefore, use
> drm_bridge->encoder->dev in place of drm_bridge->dev.
>
> [1]
As suggested in [1], the 'dev' field is a bit repetitive, since it 1:1
follows the setting and NULLing of the 'encoder' field. Therefore, use
drm_bridge->encoder->dev in place of drm_bridge->dev.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/343824/
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Suggested-by: Thomas
