On Tue 16-05-17 10:31:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > drm_malloc* has grown their own kmalloc with vmalloc fallback
> > implementations. MM has grown kvmalloc* helpers in the meantime. Let's
>
On Tue 16-05-17 12:09:08, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:53:52PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 16-05-17 10:31:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > From: Michal Hocko
> > > >
> > > >
On Tue 16-05-17 11:22:30, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > drm_malloc* has grown their own kmalloc with vmalloc fallback
> > implementations. MM has grown kvmalloc* helpers in the meantime. Let's
On Wed 17-05-17 08:59:44, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 09:44:53AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 16-05-17 12:09:08, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:53:52PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Tue 16-05-17 10:31:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > > On
From: Michal Hocko
drm_malloc* has grown their own kmalloc with vmalloc fallback
implementations. MM has grown kvmalloc* helpers in the meantime. Let's
use those because it a) reduces the code and b) MM has a better idea
how to implement fallbacks (e.g. do not vmalloc before
On Tue 16-05-17 15:08:56, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:52:55AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 16-05-17 11:22:30, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > From: Michal Hocko
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 09:44:53AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 16-05-17 12:09:08, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:53:52PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Tue 16-05-17 10:31:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:52:55AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 16-05-17 11:22:30, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > From: Michal Hocko
> > >
> > > drm_malloc* has grown their own kmalloc with vmalloc fallback
> >
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:53:52PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 16-05-17 10:31:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > From: Michal Hocko
> > >
> > > drm_malloc* has grown their own kmalloc with vmalloc fallback
> >
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> drm_malloc* has grown their own kmalloc with vmalloc fallback
> implementations. MM has grown kvmalloc* helpers in the meantime. Let's
> use those because it a) reduces the code and b) MM has
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> drm_malloc* has grown their own kmalloc with vmalloc fallback
> implementations. MM has grown kvmalloc* helpers in the meantime. Let's
> use those because it a) reduces the code and b) MM has
11 matches
Mail list logo