On 26/04/2024 12:30, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 08:01:44AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 08/03/2024 22:47, Sean Anderson wrote:
We must always register the DRM bridge, since zynqmp_dp_hpd_work_func
calls drm_bridge_hpd_notify, which in turn expects hpd_mutex to be
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 08:01:44AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 08/03/2024 22:47, Sean Anderson wrote:
> > We must always register the DRM bridge, since zynqmp_dp_hpd_work_func
> > calls drm_bridge_hpd_notify, which in turn expects hpd_mutex to be
> > initialized. We do this before
On 23/04/2024 23:50, Sean Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On 3/22/24 02:01, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Hi,
On 08/03/2024 22:47, Sean Anderson wrote:
We must always register the DRM bridge, since zynqmp_dp_hpd_work_func
calls drm_bridge_hpd_notify, which in turn expects hpd_mutex to be
initialized. We do this
Hi,
On 3/22/24 02:01, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/03/2024 22:47, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> We must always register the DRM bridge, since zynqmp_dp_hpd_work_func
>> calls drm_bridge_hpd_notify, which in turn expects hpd_mutex to be
>> initialized. We do this before zynqmp_dpsub_drm_init
Hi,
On 08/03/2024 22:47, Sean Anderson wrote:
We must always register the DRM bridge, since zynqmp_dp_hpd_work_func
calls drm_bridge_hpd_notify, which in turn expects hpd_mutex to be
initialized. We do this before zynqmp_dpsub_drm_init since that calls
drm_bridge_attach. This fixes the
We must always register the DRM bridge, since zynqmp_dp_hpd_work_func
calls drm_bridge_hpd_notify, which in turn expects hpd_mutex to be
initialized. We do this before zynqmp_dpsub_drm_init since that calls
drm_bridge_attach. This fixes the following lockdep warning:
[ 19.217084] [
