On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 05:09:59PM +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> IIRC this warning was there for me too on gcc 4.6, but it disappeared
> on gcc 4.7, which is why I decided not to send a patch for it.
A disappearing and reappearing warning happened to me recently too. I
attributed that to compiler
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:25:35PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:10:30PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > index 6ed45a984230..1191aa47adc9 100644
> > > ---
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 04:49:46PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> gcc complains that:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c: In function ?display_crc_ctl_write?:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:2393:2: warning: ?val? may be used
> uninitialized in this
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:10:30PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > index 6ed45a984230..1191aa47adc9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > +++
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> gcc complains that:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c: In function ?display_crc_ctl_write?:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:2393:2: warning: ?val? may be used
> uninitialized in this function
From: Borislav Petkov
gcc complains that:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c: In function ?display_crc_ctl_write?:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:2393:2: warning: ?val? may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:2350:6: