On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 08:30:52PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 08:12:11PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 05:31:24PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 01:05:32PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I took a
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 08:12:11PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 05:31:24PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 01:05:32PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I took a look, but it's pretty complex. You could take the code and
> > >
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 05:31:24PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 01:05:32PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > I took a look, but it's pretty complex. You could take the code and
> > reorganize it so that it is more readable, and then take the definition of
> > the
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 01:05:32PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> I took a look, but it's pretty complex. You could take the code and
> reorganize it so that it is more readable, and then take the definition of
> the ARRAY_SIZE macro, to better see what is going on.
>
> julia
>
Hello Greg,
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:41:40PM +0530, Deepak Varma wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 07:34:26PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 09:32:50AM +0200, Greg
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 03:10:27PM +0530, Deepak Varma wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:41:40PM +0530, Deepak Varma wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 07:34:26PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:41:40PM +0530, Deepak Varma wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 07:34:26PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 09:32:50AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 07:34:26PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, Deepak R Varma wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 09:32:50AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 07:00:05PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > > > The ARRAY_SIZE(foo) macro should be
On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 09:32:50AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 07:00:05PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > > The ARRAY_SIZE(foo) macro should be preferred over sizeof operator
> > > based computation such as
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 09:32:50AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 07:00:05PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > The ARRAY_SIZE(foo) macro should be preferred over sizeof operator
> > based computation such as sizeof(foo)/sizeof(foo[0]) for finding
> > number of elements
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 07:00:05PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> The ARRAY_SIZE(foo) macro should be preferred over sizeof operator
> based computation such as sizeof(foo)/sizeof(foo[0]) for finding
> number of elements in an array. Issue identified using coccicheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R
The ARRAY_SIZE(foo) macro should be preferred over sizeof operator
based computation such as sizeof(foo)/sizeof(foo[0]) for finding
number of elements in an array. Issue identified using coccicheck.
Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma
---
drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
12 matches
Mail list logo
