On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 17:49:25 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> So you are now hard-coding the size?
Yes, the change just helps developers who want to adapt to different screen
sizes.
> Is this always going to be 0, if so, why need it at all?
Not sure. For example, when HEIGHT and WIDTH are 240 and 280,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 01:28:06AM +0800, Yuguo Pei wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 17:49:25 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > So you are now hard-coding the size?
>
> Yes, the change just helps developers who want to adapt to different screen
> sizes.
So there is no change? I don't understand.
> > Is
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 12:57:47AM +0800, purofle wrote:
> Some screen sizes using st7789v chips are different from 240x320,
> and offsets need to be set to display all images properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: purofle
We need a semi-real name here please.
> ---
> drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c
Some screen sizes using st7789v chips are different from 240x320,
and offsets need to be set to display all images properly.
Signed-off-by: purofle
---
drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git
