On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 17:50 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/11/2010 04:27 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The following patch is really intended for the next merge window.
> >>
> >> RFC:
> >> 1) Are there any
On 11/11/2010 11:46 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 17:50 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>
>> On 11/11/2010 04:27 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
The following patch is really intended for
On 11/11/2010 04:27 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>
>> The following patch is really intended for the next merge window.
>>
>> RFC:
>> 1) Are there any implementations of driver::io_mem_reserve today that can't
>> use
>> the fastpath?
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> The following patch is really intended for the next merge window.
>
> RFC:
> 1) Are there any implementations of driver::io_mem_reserve today that can't
> use
> the fastpath?
> 2) Can we put an atomic requirement on
The following patch is really intended for the next merge window.
RFC:
1) Are there any implementations of driver::io_mem_reserve today that can't use
the fastpath?
2) Can we put an atomic requirement on driver::io_mem_reserve /
driver::io_mem_free?
The patch improves on the io_mem_reserve /
The following patch is really intended for the next merge window.
RFC:
1) Are there any implementations of driver::io_mem_reserve today that can't use
the fastpath?
2) Can we put an atomic requirement on driver::io_mem_reserve /
driver::io_mem_free?
The patch improves on the io_mem_reserve /
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Thomas Hellstrom thellst...@vmware.com wrote:
The following patch is really intended for the next merge window.
RFC:
1) Are there any implementations of driver::io_mem_reserve today that can't
use
the fastpath?
2) Can we put an atomic requirement on
On 11/11/2010 04:27 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Thomas Hellstromthellst...@vmware.com wrote:
The following patch is really intended for the next merge window.
RFC:
1) Are there any implementations of driver::io_mem_reserve today that can't use
the fastpath?
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 17:50 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/11/2010 04:27 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Thomas Hellstromthellst...@vmware.com
wrote:
The following patch is really intended for the next merge window.
RFC:
1) Are there any
On 11/11/2010 11:46 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 17:50 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/11/2010 04:27 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Thomas Hellstromthellst...@vmware.com
wrote:
The following patch is really intended for the
10 matches
Mail list logo