On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 19:14 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2012-06-25 17:25 +0200, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>
>> > This fixes the extra_mode walk to be much more conservative. I still think
>> > the whole idea is bogus and that guessing about
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 19:14 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-06-25 17:25 +0200, Adam Jackson wrote:
This fixes the extra_mode walk to be much more conservative. I still think
the whole idea is bogus and that guessing
On 2012-06-25 17:25 +0200, Adam Jackson wrote:
> This fixes the extra_mode walk to be much more conservative. I still think
> the whole idea is bogus and that guessing about clone mode sizes is a
> userspace policy decision, but apparently xrandr --newmode / --addmode is
> unreasonably
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 19:14 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-06-25 17:25 +0200, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > This fixes the extra_mode walk to be much more conservative. I still think
> > the whole idea is bogus and that guessing about clone mode sizes is a
> > userspace policy decision, but
This fixes the extra_mode walk to be much more conservative. I still think
the whole idea is bogus and that guessing about clone mode sizes is a
userspace policy decision, but apparently xrandr --newmode / --addmode is
unreasonably burdensome.
This should fix a number of reported regressions,
This fixes the extra_mode walk to be much more conservative. I still think
the whole idea is bogus and that guessing about clone mode sizes is a
userspace policy decision, but apparently xrandr --newmode / --addmode is
unreasonably burdensome.
This should fix a number of reported regressions,
On 2012-06-25 17:25 +0200, Adam Jackson wrote:
This fixes the extra_mode walk to be much more conservative. I still think
the whole idea is bogus and that guessing about clone mode sizes is a
userspace policy decision, but apparently xrandr --newmode / --addmode is
unreasonably burdensome.
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 19:14 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-06-25 17:25 +0200, Adam Jackson wrote:
This fixes the extra_mode walk to be much more conservative. I still think
the whole idea is bogus and that guessing about clone mode sizes is a
userspace policy decision, but apparently