On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 13:28 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 8:10 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > Do we need to support arm,pl11x,tft-r0g0b0-pads before
> > we can obsolete fbdev stuff?
>
> No I don't think so,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 2:47 PM Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 13:28 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 8:10 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > Do we need to support arm,pl11x,tft-r0g0b0-pads before
>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 8:10 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > So this is a cold-coded attempt to move the TI nspire over to
> > using DRM. It is more or less the last user of the old fbdev
> > driver so it is a noble cause and interesting
Hi Linus.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> So this is a cold-coded attempt to move the TI nspire over to
> using DRM. It is more or less the last user of the old fbdev
> driver so it is a noble cause and interesting usecase.
Do we need to support
So this is a cold-coded attempt to move the TI nspire over to
using DRM. It is more or less the last user of the old fbdev
driver so it is a noble cause and interesting usecase.
This can be applied on top of a vanilla Torvalds v5.3-rc1
kernel out since sunday.
I do not expect these patches to