[PATCH 0/3] drm/cma: use prim helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

On 06/19/2013 08:02 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Joonyoung, > > On Wednesday 12 June 2013 22:16:14 Joonyoung Shim wrote: >> Hi, >> >> GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for >> dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit >> 89177644a7b6306e6084a89eab

[PATCH 0/3] drm/cma: use prim helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

Hi Joonyoung, On Wednesday 12 June 2013 22:16:14 Joonyoung Shim wrote: > Hi, > > GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for > dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit > 89177644a7b6306e6084a89eab7e290f4bfef397 "drm: add prime helpers", so > this patchs

Re: [PATCH 0/3] drm/cma: use prim helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

On 06/19/2013 08:02 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Joonyoung, On Wednesday 12 June 2013 22:16:14 Joonyoung Shim wrote: Hi, GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit 89177644a7b6306e6084a89eab7e290f4bfef397 "

Re: [PATCH 0/3] drm/cma: use prim helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

Hi Joonyoung, On Wednesday 12 June 2013 22:16:14 Joonyoung Shim wrote: > Hi, > > GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for > dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit > 89177644a7b6306e6084a89eab7e290f4bfef397 "drm: add prime helpers", so > this patchs

[PATCH 0/3] drm/cma: use prim helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

Hi, GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit 89177644a7b6306e6084a89eab7e290f4bfef397 "drm: add prime helpers", so this patchset is to replace from using GEM CMA specific functions to using prime helpers. Than

[PATCH 0/3] drm/cma: use prim helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

Hi Joonyoung, Thank you for the patches. I'll try to review and test them next week. On Wednesday 12 June 2013 22:16:14 Joonyoung Shim wrote: > Hi, > > GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for > dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit > 89177644a7b

Re: [PATCH 0/3] drm/cma: use prim helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

Hi Joonyoung, Thank you for the patches. I'll try to review and test them next week. On Wednesday 12 June 2013 22:16:14 Joonyoung Shim wrote: > Hi, > > GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for > dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit > 89177644a7b

[PATCH 0/3] drm/cma: use prim helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

Hi, GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit 89177644a7b6306e6084a89eab7e290f4bfef397 "drm: add prime helpers", so this patchset is to replace from using GEM CMA specific functions to using prime helpers. Tha