[PATCH 0/5][-next] TTM bo reservation and fencing improvements

Hi, I have tested Thomas drm-ttm(-next) patch-sets in combination with Daniel Vetter's patch-sets (series see below). No bad - no good in OpenArena-benchmark. ( It is definitely pageflip-support patches causing a slow-down of 4-5 fps... 13-14 vs. 17-18 fps on a radeon RV250 is a real difference.

[PATCH 0/5][-next] TTM bo reservation and fencing improvements

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > On 11/17/2010 05:40 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Against which GIT tree is this patchset, against latest drm-next GIT they >> fail? >> Missing a patch or patchset? >> > > On top of drm-next you first need to apply > > drm/ttm: ?Fix up a t

[PATCH 0/5][-next] TTM bo reservation and fencing improvements

On 11/17/2010 05:40 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Against which GIT tree is this patchset, against latest drm-next GIT they > fail? > Missing a patch or patchset? > On top of drm-next you first need to apply drm/ttm: Fix up a theoretical deadlock. drm/ttm: Add a bo list reserve fastpath (need v2

[PATCH 0/5][-next] TTM bo reservation and fencing improvements

Against which GIT tree is this patchset, against latest drm-next GIT they fail? Missing a patch or patchset? - Sedat - $ cd /mnt/sdb5/linux-kernel/drm-2.6 $ git branch * drm-next master $ git describe v2.6.34-rc5-32040-g01d5a1f $ cat patches/series drm-ttm-next/1-5-drm-ttm-Optimize-ttm_eu_ba

Re: [PATCH 0/5][-next] TTM bo reservation and fencing improvements

Hi, I have tested Thomas drm-ttm(-next) patch-sets in combination with Daniel Vetter's patch-sets (series see below). No bad - no good in OpenArena-benchmark. ( It is definitely pageflip-support patches causing a slow-down of 4-5 fps... 13-14 vs. 17-18 fps on a radeon RV250 is a real difference.

[PATCH 0/5][-next] TTM bo reservation and fencing improvements

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > This patch series improves on the performance and correctness of the > reserving / fencing sequence. > Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse

[PATCH 0/5][-next] TTM bo reservation and fencing improvements

This patch series improves on the performance and correctness of the reserving / fencing sequence.

Re: [PATCH 0/5][-next] TTM bo reservation and fencing improvements

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > On 11/17/2010 05:40 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Against which GIT tree is this patchset, against latest drm-next GIT they >> fail? >> Missing a patch or patchset? >> > > On top of drm-next you first need to apply > > drm/ttm:  Fix up a th

Re: [PATCH 0/5][-next] TTM bo reservation and fencing improvements

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > This patch series improves on the performance and correctness of the > reserving / fencing sequence. > Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http

Re: [PATCH 0/5][-next] TTM bo reservation and fencing improvements

On 11/17/2010 05:40 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: Against which GIT tree is this patchset, against latest drm-next GIT they fail? Missing a patch or patchset? On top of drm-next you first need to apply drm/ttm: Fix up a theoretical deadlock. drm/ttm: Add a bo list reserve fastpath (need v2 which

Re: [PATCH 0/5][-next] TTM bo reservation and fencing improvements

Against which GIT tree is this patchset, against latest drm-next GIT they fail? Missing a patch or patchset? - Sedat - $ cd /mnt/sdb5/linux-kernel/drm-2.6 $ git branch * drm-next master $ git describe v2.6.34-rc5-32040-g01d5a1f $ cat patches/series drm-ttm-next/1-5-drm-ttm-Optimize-ttm_eu_ba

[PATCH 0/5][-next] TTM bo reservation and fencing improvements

This patch series improves on the performance and correctness of the reserving / fencing sequence. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel