On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 12:45 AM Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> So I guess we missed -rc1. Any chance we could get an immutable branch
> off -rc1 that you will pull into your main branch and I hopefully can
> persuade other maintainers to pull as well so we do not need to drag it
> over 2+ merge
Hi Linus,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 05:22:07PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> > wrote:
> >
> > > If we agree in principle, I would like to have the very first 3 patches
> > > in
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
>
> > If we agree in principle, I would like to have the very first 3 patches
> > in an immutable branch off maybe -rc8 so that it can be pulled into
> > individual
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> If we agree in principle, I would like to have the very first 3 patches
> in an immutable branch off maybe -rc8 so that it can be pulled into
> individual subsystems so that patches switching various drivers to
> fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:52:04AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> This series attempts to add support for software nodes to gpiolib, using
> software node references that were introduced recently. This allows us
> to convert more drivers to the generic device properties and drop
> support for
This series attempts to add support for software nodes to gpiolib, using
software node references that were introduced recently. This allows us
to convert more drivers to the generic device properties and drop
support for custom platform data:
static const struct software_node gpio_bank_b_node =
