On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> - You have an explicit callback for vblank events (well, just the
>> interrupt, afaics no support to get a vblank event for a specific frame
>> in the future). Any reason not t
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> - You have an explicit callback for vblank events (well, just the
> interrupt, afaics no support to get a vblank event for a specific frame
> in the future). Any reason not to use android syncpoint fences for this
> like everywhere el
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> oh, that's right.. I'm glad you reminded me, I do remember now talk of
> a field which drivers could use to return some opaque (to drm core)
> handle/value/token/whatever..
>
> hmm, for the non-vsync'd multi-display case, does it matter much one
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 03:34:19PM -0700, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>
> > > Hm, do you have some pointers to read up on this? I still think a more
> > > elaborate fail scheme is overkill, but maybe reading a bit of android
> > code
> > > convinces me
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>> > Hm, do you have some pointers to read up on this? I still think a more
>> > elaborate fail scheme is overkill, but maybe reading a bit of android
>> > code
>> > convinces me different
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > Hm, do you have some pointers to read up on this? I still think a more
> > elaborate fail scheme is overkill, but maybe reading a bit of android
> code
> > convinces me differently ;-)
>
> sadly no pointers to anything to read (but ofc would b
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 08:23:31AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 05:22:37PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On the i915 side I think all the various pieces we need are finally coming
> > together, and I hope a lot of that go
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 05:22:37PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> Previous revision of series:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-November/049594.html
>
> And if you prefer, in git form:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~robclark/linux/log/?h=cold-fusion
> git://people.freedesktop.org/
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 05:22:37PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>> Previous revision of series:
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-November/049594.html
>>
>> And if you prefer, in git form:
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~robc
Previous revision of series:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-November/049594.html
And if you prefer, in git form:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~robclark/linux/log/?h=cold-fusion
git://people.freedesktop.org/~robclark/linux cold-fusion
Compared to previous revision:
* rebased
10 matches
Mail list logo
