On 9 June 2016 at 13:53, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:45:34PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 04:07:59PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>> > Hi Greg,
>> >
>> > Any comment on this?
>>
>> I am just starting to catch up on patches, please give me some
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:45:34PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 04:07:59PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Any comment on this?
>
> I am just starting to catch up on patches, please give me some time,
> staging patches are at the bottom of my prior
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 04:07:59PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Any comment on this?
I am just starting to catch up on patches, please give me some time,
staging patches are at the bottom of my priority list, sorry.
greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Any comment on this?
Gustavo
2016-05-31 Gustavo Padovan :
> From: Gustavo Padovan
>
> Hi,
>
> The following patches do a clean up on the sw_sync inteface. It starts by
> removing struct sync_timeline_ops, which was creating unecessary wrappers
> in the code and the start to
From: Gustavo Padovan
Hi,
The following patches do a clean up on the sw_sync inteface. It starts by
removing struct sync_timeline_ops, which was creating unecessary wrappers
in the code and the start to organize the sync_timeline and sw_sync code
better.
sw_sync interface was moved to sw_sync.c