Re: [PATCH 06/10] backlight/pwm-backlight: Remove struct backlight_ops.check_fb

2024-02-20 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Thomas Zimmermann writes: > The internal check_fb callback from struct pwm_bl_data is never > implemented. thus the driver's implementation of check_fb always > returns true, which is the backlight core's default if no > implementation has been set. So remove the code from the driver. > >

Re: [PATCH 06/10] backlight/pwm-backlight: Remove struct backlight_ops.check_fb

2024-02-15 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 05:16:39PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > The internal check_fb callback from struct pwm_bl_data is never > implemented. thus the driver's implementation of check_fb always > returns true, which is the backlight core's default if no > implementation has been set. So

Re: [PATCH 06/10] backlight/pwm-backlight: Remove struct backlight_ops.check_fb

2024-02-12 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello Thomas, On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 05:16:39PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > The internal check_fb callback from struct pwm_bl_data is never > implemented. thus the driver's implementation of check_fb always > returns true, which is the backlight core's default if no > implementation has

[PATCH 06/10] backlight/pwm-backlight: Remove struct backlight_ops.check_fb

2024-02-12 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
The internal check_fb callback from struct pwm_bl_data is never implemented. thus the driver's implementation of check_fb always returns true, which is the backlight core's default if no implementation has been set. So remove the code from the driver. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann Cc: "Uwe