On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 05:21:17PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 04:15:49PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 1:34 PM Stanislaw Gruszka
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 03:35:20PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > > Please CC me
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 04:15:49PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 1:34 PM Stanislaw Gruszka
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 03:35:20PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > Please CC me on future revisions.
> > >
> > > As of 6.2, the prandom namespace is *only* for
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 05:53:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 04:15:49PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 1:34 PM Stanislaw Gruszka
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 03:35:20PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > > Please CC me on
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 04:15:49PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 1:34 PM Stanislaw Gruszka
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 03:35:20PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > Please CC me on future revisions.
> > >
> > > As of 6.2, the prandom namespace is *only* for
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 1:34 PM Stanislaw Gruszka
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 03:35:20PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Please CC me on future revisions.
> >
> > As of 6.2, the prandom namespace is *only* for predictable randomness.
> > There's no need to rename anything. So nack on
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 03:35:20PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Please CC me on future revisions.
>
> As of 6.2, the prandom namespace is *only* for predictable randomness.
> There's no need to rename anything. So nack on this patch 1/5.
It is not obvious (for casual developers like me)
Please CC me on future revisions.
As of 6.2, the prandom namespace is *only* for predictable randomness.
There's no need to rename anything. So nack on this patch 1/5.
With regards to the remaining patches in this series, if you want to
move prandom_u32_state callers over to get_random_bytes()
From: David
Since the two functions
prandom_byte_state and prandom_u32_state
use the weak prng prandom_u32,
we added the prefix predictable_rng,
to their signatures so it is clear they are weak.
Signed-off-by: David
---
arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c | 2 +-
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:16:04AM +0200, david.keisars...@mail.huji.ac.il
wrote:
> From: David
>
> Since the two functions
> prandom_byte_state and prandom_u32_state
> use the weak prng prandom_u32,
> we added the prefix predictable_rng,
> to their signatures so it is clear they are weak.