[PATCH 11/26] drm/radeon: return -ENOENT in fence_wait_next v2

2012-04-25 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2012-04-25 at 14:46 +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: > We should signal the caller that we haven't waited at all. > > v2: only change fence_wait_next not fence_wait_last. > > Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig Reviewed-by: Michel D?nzer -- Earthling Michel D?nzer |

[PATCH 11/26] drm/radeon: return -ENOENT in fence_wait_next v2

2012-04-25 Thread Christian König
We should signal the caller that we haven't waited at all. v2: only change fence_wait_next not fence_wait_last. Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 11/26] drm/radeon: return -ENOENT in fence_wait_next v2

2012-04-25 Thread Christian König
We should signal the caller that we haven't waited at all. v2: only change fence_wait_next not fence_wait_last. Signed-off-by: Christian König deathsim...@vodafone.de --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH 11/26] drm/radeon: return -ENOENT in fence_wait_next v2

2012-04-25 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2012-04-25 at 14:46 +0200, Christian König wrote: We should signal the caller that we haven't waited at all. v2: only change fence_wait_next not fence_wait_last. Signed-off-by: Christian König deathsim...@vodafone.de Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com --