On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 7:00 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 01:00:35PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 12:25 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >
> > > The 'toppoly' vendor prefix is in use and refers to TPO, whose DT vendor
> > > prefix is
Hi Rob,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 01:00:35PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 12:25 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >
> > The 'toppoly' vendor prefix is in use and refers to TPO, whose DT vendor
> > prefix is already defined as 'tpo'. Add 'toppoly' as an alternative and
> > document
On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 12:25 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> The 'toppoly' vendor prefix is in use and refers to TPO, whose DT vendor
> prefix is already defined as 'tpo'. Add 'toppoly' as an alternative and
> document it as legacy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> ---
>
The 'toppoly' vendor prefix is in use and refers to TPO, whose DT vendor
prefix is already defined as 'tpo'. Add 'toppoly' as an alternative and
document it as legacy.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2
