On 08/02/24 06:39, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 16:49:56 +0100
> Louis Chauvet wrote:
>
>> Hello Pekka, Arthur, Maxime,
>
> Hi all
>
>>> Change the composition algorithm to iterate over pixels instead of
>>> lines.
>>> It allows a simpler management of
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 16:49:56 +0100
Louis Chauvet wrote:
> Hello Pekka, Arthur, Maxime,
Hi all
> > > > >> Change the composition algorithm to iterate over pixels instead
> > > > >> of lines.
> > > > >> It allows a simpler management of rotation and pixel access for
> > > > >>
On 07/02/24 13:03, Louis Chauvet wrote:
> Hello Pekka, Arthur,
>
> [...]
>
Would it be possible to have a standardised benchmark specifically
for performance rather than correctness, in IGT or where-ever it
would make sense? Then it would be simple to tell contributors to
Hello Pekka, Arthur,
[...]
> > > Would it be possible to have a standardised benchmark specifically
> > > for performance rather than correctness, in IGT or where-ever it
> > > would make sense? Then it would be simple to tell contributors to
> > > run this and report the numbers before and
Hello Pekka, Arthur, Maxime,
> > > >> Change the composition algorithm to iterate over pixels instead of
> > > >> lines.
> > > >> It allows a simpler management of rotation and pixel access for
> > > >> complex formats.
> > > >>
> > > >> This new algorithm allows
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 14:57:48 -0300
Arthur Grillo wrote:
> On 02/02/24 16:45, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
...
> > Would it be possible to have a standardised benchmark specifically
> > for performance rather than correctness, in IGT or where-ever it
> > would make sense? Then it would be simple to
On 02/02/24 16:45, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:07:34 +0100
> Miquel Raynal wrote:
>
>> Hi Pekka,
>
> Hi Miquel,
>
> I'm happy to see no hard feelings below. I know I may be blunt at
> times.
>
> Another thing coming to my mind is that I suppose there is no
> agreed
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 12:12:04 +0200
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:02:20 -0300
> Arthur Grillo wrote:
>
> > On 02/02/24 12:49, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 13:13:22 +0100
> > > Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello Maxime,
> > >>
> > >> + Arthur
> > >>
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:02:20 -0300
Arthur Grillo wrote:
> On 02/02/24 12:49, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 13:13:22 +0100
> > Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Maxime,
> >>
> >> + Arthur
> >>
> >> mrip...@kernel.org wrote on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:53:37 +0100:
> >>
> >>> Hi
On 02/02/24 12:49, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 13:13:22 +0100
> Miquel Raynal wrote:
>
>> Hello Maxime,
>>
>> + Arthur
>>
>> mrip...@kernel.org wrote on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:53:37 +0100:
>>
>>> Hi Miquel,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:26:01AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:07:34 +0100
Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
Hi Miquel,
I'm happy to see no hard feelings below. I know I may be blunt at
times.
Another thing coming to my mind is that I suppose there is no
agreed standard benchmark for VKMS performance, is there?
I recall people
Hi Pekka,
pekka.paala...@haloniitty.fi wrote on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:49:13 +0200:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 13:13:22 +0100
> Miquel Raynal wrote:
>
> > Hello Maxime,
> >
> > + Arthur
> >
> > mrip...@kernel.org wrote on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:53:37 +0100:
> >
> > > Hi Miquel,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 13:13:22 +0100
Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hello Maxime,
>
> + Arthur
>
> mrip...@kernel.org wrote on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:53:37 +0100:
>
> > Hi Miquel,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:26:01AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > pekka.paala...@haloniitty.fi wrote on Fri, 2 Feb
Hello Maxime,
+ Arthur
mrip...@kernel.org wrote on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:53:37 +0100:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:26:01AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > pekka.paala...@haloniitty.fi wrote on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:55:22 +0200:
> >
> > > On Thu, 01 Feb 2024 18:31:32 +0100
> > >
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:26:01 +0100
Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
>
> pekka.paala...@haloniitty.fi wrote on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:55:22 +0200:
>
> > On Thu, 01 Feb 2024 18:31:32 +0100
> > Louis Chauvet wrote:
> >
> > > Change the composition algorithm to iterate over pixels instead of lines.
Hi Miquel,
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:26:01AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> pekka.paala...@haloniitty.fi wrote on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:55:22 +0200:
>
> > On Thu, 01 Feb 2024 18:31:32 +0100
> > Louis Chauvet wrote:
> >
> > > Change the composition algorithm to iterate over pixels instead of
Hi Miquel,
On 2/2/24 06:26, Miquel Raynal wrote:
Hi Pekka,
pekka.paala...@haloniitty.fi wrote on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:55:22 +0200:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2024 18:31:32 +0100
Louis Chauvet wrote:
Change the composition algorithm to iterate over pixels instead of lines.
It allows a simpler management
Hi Pekka,
pekka.paala...@haloniitty.fi wrote on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:55:22 +0200:
> On Thu, 01 Feb 2024 18:31:32 +0100
> Louis Chauvet wrote:
>
> > Change the composition algorithm to iterate over pixels instead of lines.
> > It allows a simpler management of rotation and pixel access for
On Thu, 01 Feb 2024 18:31:32 +0100
Louis Chauvet wrote:
> Change the composition algorithm to iterate over pixels instead of lines.
> It allows a simpler management of rotation and pixel access for complex
> formats.
>
> This new algorithm allows read_pixel function to have access to x/y
>
Change the composition algorithm to iterate over pixels instead of lines.
It allows a simpler management of rotation and pixel access for complex formats.
This new algorithm allows read_pixel function to have access to x/y
coordinates and make it possible to read the correct thing in a block
when
20 matches
Mail list logo
