On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:00:17PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Don, 2011-11-17 at 15:06 +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > On Mit, 2011-11-16 at 20:42 +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2011-11-16 at 20:42 +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> >
> > Name the formats as DRM_FORMAT_X instead of DRM_FOURCC_X. Use consistent
> > names, especially for the RGB formats. Component order and byte order
On Don, 2011-11-17 at 15:06 +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Mit, 2011-11-16 at 20:42 +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Name the formats as DRM_FORMAT_X instead of DRM_FOURCC_X. Use consistent
> > >
On Mit, 2011-11-16 at 20:42 +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
>
> Name the formats as DRM_FORMAT_X instead of DRM_FOURCC_X. Use consistent
> names, especially for the RGB formats. Component order and byte order are
> now strictly specified for each format.
>
> The RGB format naming
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:16:31PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi Ville,
>
> Regarding 3 plane YCbCr, DRM_FORMAT_yuv444 (non sub-sampled YCbCr)
> would also be useful.
Yeah I was wondering whether to add that. So far I've not run into
hardware which can eat that, so I left it out for now.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mit, 2011-11-16 at 20:42 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Name the formats as DRM_FORMAT_X instead of DRM_FOURCC_X. Use consistent
names, especially for the RGB formats. Component order and byte order are
now
On Don, 2011-11-17 at 15:06 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mit, 2011-11-16 at 20:42 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Name the formats as DRM_FORMAT_X instead of DRM_FOURCC_X. Use consistent
names, especially
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:00:17PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Don, 2011-11-17 at 15:06 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mit, 2011-11-16 at 20:42 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Name the formats as
From: Ville Syrj?l?
Name the formats as DRM_FORMAT_X instead of DRM_FOURCC_X. Use consistent
names, especially for the RGB formats. Component order and byte order are
now strictly specified for each format.
The RGB format naming follows a convention where the
Hi Ville,
Regarding 3 plane YCbCr, DRM_FORMAT_yuv444 (non sub-sampled YCbCr)
would also be useful.
-Ilyes
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:42 PM, wrote:
> From: Ville Syrj?l?
>
> Name the formats as DRM_FORMAT_X instead of DRM_FOURCC_X. Use consistent
> names, especially for the RGB formats.
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Name the formats as DRM_FORMAT_X instead of DRM_FOURCC_X. Use consistent
names, especially for the RGB formats. Component order and byte order are
now strictly specified for each format.
The RGB format naming follows a convention where the
Hi Ville,
Regarding 3 plane YCbCr, DRM_FORMAT_yuv444 (non sub-sampled YCbCr)
would also be useful.
-Ilyes
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:42 PM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Name the formats as DRM_FORMAT_X instead of DRM_FOURCC_X. Use
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:16:31PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Hi Ville,
Regarding 3 plane YCbCr, DRM_FORMAT_yuv444 (non sub-sampled YCbCr)
would also be useful.
Yeah I was wondering whether to add that. So far I've not run into
hardware which can eat that, so I left it out for now.
Packed
On Mit, 2011-11-16 at 20:42 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Name the formats as DRM_FORMAT_X instead of DRM_FOURCC_X. Use consistent
names, especially for the RGB formats. Component order and byte order are
now strictly specified for each format.
The RGB format naming follows
14 matches
Mail list logo