On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 18:01 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Maarten Maathuis
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:25 -0500, Andrew
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:51 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:25 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:32 -0500, Andy Lutomirski
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:25 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:32 -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> The old code generated an interrupt storm bad enough to completely
> >> take down my system.
> >>
> >> This only
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:32 -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> The old code generated an interrupt storm bad enough to completely
> take down my system.
>
> This only fixes the bits that are defined nouveau_regs.h. Newer hardware
> uses another register that isn't described, and I don't have that
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:25 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:32 -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
The old code generated an interrupt storm bad enough to completely
take down my system.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h |6 +
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_irq.c |1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c | 35
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Maarten Maathuis
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:25 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:25 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:32 -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> >> The old code generated an interrupt storm bad enough to
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:32 -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> The old code generated an interrupt storm bad enough to completely
>> take down my system.
>>
>> This only fixes the bits that are defined nouveau_regs.h. ?Newer hardware
>> uses
The old code generated an interrupt storm bad enough to completely
take down my system.
This only fixes the bits that are defined nouveau_regs.h. Newer hardware
uses another register that isn't described, and I don't have that hardware
to test.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski
Cc:
---
The old code generated an interrupt storm bad enough to completely
take down my system.
This only fixes the bits that are defined nouveau_regs.h. Newer hardware
uses another register that isn't described, and I don't have that hardware
to test.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu
Cc:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:32 -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
The old code generated an interrupt storm bad enough to completely
take down my system.
This only fixes the bits that are defined nouveau_regs.h. Newer hardware
uses another register that isn't described, and I don't have that
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ben Skeggs bske...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:32 -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
The old code generated an interrupt storm bad enough to completely
take down my system.
This only fixes the bits that are defined nouveau_regs.h. Newer hardware
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:25 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ben Skeggs bske...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:32 -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
The old code generated an interrupt storm bad enough to completely
take down my system.
This only
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Ben Skeggs bske...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:25 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ben Skeggs bske...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:32 -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
The old code generated an
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Ben Skeggs bske...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:25 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ben Skeggs bske...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:51 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Ben Skeggs bske...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:25 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ben Skeggs bske...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:32
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Ben Skeggs bske...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:25 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Nov
The old code generated an interrupt storm bad enough to completely
take down my system.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h |6 +
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_irq.c |1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c | 35
19 matches
Mail list logo
