Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Move GEM BO inside drm_framebuffer

2018-05-17 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi Ville, On 23 March 2018 at 14:49, Daniel Stone wrote: > On 23 March 2018 at 14:42, Ville Syrjälä > wrote: >> Hmm. I'm thinking we can stick to the single reference per fb. >> IIRC this counter is there just to prevent changes of the obj

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Move GEM BO inside drm_framebuffer

2018-03-23 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi Ville, On 23 March 2018 at 14:42, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:45:50PM +, Daniel Stone wrote: >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> @@ -13916,7 +13916,8 @@ static void

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Move GEM BO inside drm_framebuffer

2018-03-23 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:45:50PM +, Daniel Stone wrote: > Since drm_framebuffer can now store GEM objects directly, place them > there rather than in our own subclass. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone > Cc: Jani Nikula > Cc: Joonas

[PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Move GEM BO inside drm_framebuffer

2018-03-23 Thread Daniel Stone
Since drm_framebuffer can now store GEM objects directly, place them there rather than in our own subclass. Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: Rodrigo Vivi