On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:25:03PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> While we want to potentially support multiple different gamma/degamma
> LUT sizes we can (and should) at least check that the blob length
> is a multiple of the LUT entry size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjä
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 07:58:07PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> Regards
>
> Shashank
>
>
> On 3/1/2018 6:54 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:43:21PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Shashank
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/24/2018 12:55 AM, Ville Syrjala wrote
Regards
Shashank
On 3/1/2018 6:54 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:43:21PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
Regards
Shashank
On 2/24/2018 12:55 AM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä
While we want to potentially support multiple different gamma/degamma
LUT sizes w
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:43:21PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> Regards
>
> Shashank
>
>
> On 2/24/2018 12:55 AM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > While we want to potentially support multiple different gamma/degamma
> > LUT sizes we can (and should) at least check that
Regards
Shashank
On 2/24/2018 12:55 AM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä
While we want to potentially support multiple different gamma/degamma
LUT sizes we can (and should) at least check that the blob length
is a multiple of the LUT entry size.
I dint understand the exact idea behin
From: Ville Syrjälä
While we want to potentially support multiple different gamma/degamma
LUT sizes we can (and should) at least check that the blob length
is a multiple of the LUT entry size.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 15 +++
1 file changed, 1
