[PATCH 3/9] drm: kill drm_mm_node->private

2010-05-20 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 07:03:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:25:07AM +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:11:45PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Only ever assigned, never used. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > > > > NAK > > > > p

[PATCH 3/9] drm: kill drm_mm_node->private

2010-05-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:25:07AM +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:11:45PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Only ever assigned, never used. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > > NAK > > private was to be use when doing range restricted allocation > somehow the patch t

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm: kill drm_mm_node->private

2010-05-19 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 07:03:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:25:07AM +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:11:45PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Only ever assigned, never used. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > > > > NAK > > > > p

[PATCH 3/9] drm: kill drm_mm_node->private

2010-05-19 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:11:45PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Only ever assigned, never used. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter NAK private was to be use when doing range restricted allocation somehow the patch that use it was drop/forgot/lost along the was i will try to see i have it and red

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm: kill drm_mm_node->private

2010-05-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:25:07AM +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:11:45PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Only ever assigned, never used. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > > NAK > > private was to be use when doing range restricted allocation > somehow the patch t

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm: kill drm_mm_node->private

2010-05-19 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:11:45PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Only ever assigned, never used. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter NAK private was to be use when doing range restricted allocation somehow the patch that use it was drop/forgot/lost along the was i will try to see i have it and red

[PATCH 3/9] drm: kill drm_mm_node->private

2010-05-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
Only ever assigned, never used. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |4 +--- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c |6 -- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c |2 -- include/drm/drm_mm.h |1 - 4 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 12 deletions

[PATCH 3/9] drm: kill drm_mm_node->private

2010-05-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
Only ever assigned, never used. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |4 +--- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c |6 -- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c |2 -- include/drm/drm_mm.h |1 - 4 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 12 deletions