The code sequence:
dev->coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(24);
dev->dma_mask = &dev->coherent_dma_mask;
bypasses the architectures check on the DMA mask. It can be replaced
with dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(), avoiding the direct initialization
of this mask.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk>
---
drivers/parport/parport_pc.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c b/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
index 903e128..9637615 100644
--- a/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
+++ b/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
@@ -2004,6 +2004,7 @@ struct parport *parport_pc_probe_port(unsigned long int
base,
struct resource *ECR_res = NULL;
struct resource *EPP_res = NULL;
struct platform_device *pdev = NULL;
+ int ret;
if (!dev) {
/* We need a physical device to attach to, but none was
@@ -2014,8 +2015,11 @@ struct parport *parport_pc_probe_port(unsigned long int
base,
return NULL;
dev = &pdev->dev;
- dev->coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(24);
- dev->dma_mask = &dev->coherent_dma_mask;
+ ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(24));
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Unable to set coherent dma mask:
disabling DMA\n");
+ dma = PARPORT_DMA_NONE;
+ }
}
ops = kmalloc(sizeof(struct parport_operations), GFP_KERNEL);
--
1.7.4.4
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
