Boris Brezillon writes:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 12:49:11 -0800
> Eric Anholt wrote:
>
>> Boris Brezillon writes:
>>
>> > vc4_plane_atomic_async_check() was only based on the
>> > state->{crtc,src}_{w,h} which was fine since scaling was not allowed on
>> > the cursor plane.
>> >
>> > We are about
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 12:49:11 -0800
Eric Anholt wrote:
> Boris Brezillon writes:
>
> > vc4_plane_atomic_async_check() was only based on the
> > state->{crtc,src}_{w,h} which was fine since scaling was not allowed on
> > the cursor plane.
> >
> > We are about to change that to properly support un
Boris Brezillon writes:
> vc4_plane_atomic_async_check() was only based on the
> state->{crtc,src}_{w,h} which was fine since scaling was not allowed on
> the cursor plane.
>
> We are about to change that to properly support underscan, and, in order
> to make the async check more reliable, we cal
vc4_plane_atomic_async_check() was only based on the
state->{crtc,src}_{w,h} which was fine since scaling was not allowed on
the cursor plane.
We are about to change that to properly support underscan, and, in order
to make the async check more reliable, we call vc4_plane_mode_set()
from there and