On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>Eric E:
>>> +struct pl111_variant_data pl110_variant = {
>>
>> I think this (and `pl111_variant` below) can be `static const`, right?
>>
> Static - yes, const - I don't think so.
> Struct amba_id::data lacks the constness, so the const qualif
On 31 August 2017 at 11:19, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2017-08-30 20:07:08 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> We detect and enable the use of the PL110 variant, an earlier
>> incarnation of PL111. The only real difference is that the
>> control and interrupt enable registers have swapped pl
Linus Walleij writes:
> We detect and enable the use of the PL110 variant, an earlier
> incarnation of PL111. The only real difference is that the
> control and interrupt enable registers have swapped place.
> The Versatile AB and Versatile PB have a variant inbetween
> PL110 and PL111, it is PL1
On Wednesday, 2017-08-30 20:07:08 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> We detect and enable the use of the PL110 variant, an earlier
> incarnation of PL111. The only real difference is that the
> control and interrupt enable registers have swapped place.
> The Versatile AB and Versatile PB have a variant
We detect and enable the use of the PL110 variant, an earlier
incarnation of PL111. The only real difference is that the
control and interrupt enable registers have swapped place.
The Versatile AB and Versatile PB have a variant inbetween
PL110 and PL111, it is PL110 but they have already swapped t
