On 11/17/15 12:28, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:53:13PM +0200, Jyri Sarha wrote:
>> Since first RFC version:
>> - Added "drm/atomic: Track drm_plane's active state"-patch
>>
>> We would need something like this to get rid off OMAPDSS somewhat
>> messy runtime_resume code. How
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:53:13PM +0200, Jyri Sarha wrote:
> Since first RFC version:
> - Added "drm/atomic: Track drm_plane's active state"-patch
>
> We would need something like this to get rid off OMAPDSS somewhat
> messy runtime_resume code. How does this look, could this generic
> solution
Since first RFC version:
- Added "drm/atomic: Track drm_plane's active state"-patch
We would need something like this to get rid off OMAPDSS somewhat
messy runtime_resume code. How does this look, could this generic
solution be refined to be acceptable for mainline, or should we start
looking a