On 16 October 2015 at 23:31, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:27:10PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 16 October 2015 at 23:11, Matt Roper wrote:
>> > Both drmGetDevice() and drmGetDevices() currently print a warning when
>> > they encounter an unknown (non-PCI) subsystem type for
On 16 October 2015 at 23:11, Matt Roper wrote:
> Both drmGetDevice() and drmGetDevices() currently print a warning when
> they encounter an unknown (non-PCI) subsystem type for a device node,
> but they still proceed to assume that the drmDevicePtr was initialized
> and try to add it to the local
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Matt Roper
wrote:
> Both drmGetDevice() and drmGetDevices() currently print a warning when
> they encounter an unknown (non-PCI) subsystem type for a device node,
> but they still proceed to assume that the drmDevicePtr was initialized
> and try to add it to the
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:27:10PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 16 October 2015 at 23:11, Matt Roper wrote:
> > Both drmGetDevice() and drmGetDevices() currently print a warning when
> > they encounter an unknown (non-PCI) subsystem type for a device node,
> > but they still proceed to assume
Both drmGetDevice() and drmGetDevices() currently print a warning when
they encounter an unknown (non-PCI) subsystem type for a device node,
but they still proceed to assume that the drmDevicePtr was initialized
and try to add it to the local device array. Add a 'continue' to the
error case
