[PATCH libdrm 3/5] modetest: print more about our properties

2012-04-21 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2012/3/29 Eugeni Dodonov : > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 18:28, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > > I don't know if it should go into a separate patch though. But it is aligned > to the other formatting patterns you do, and it certainly looks nicer this > way, and it shouldn't break anything anyway. So I am

Re: [PATCH libdrm 3/5] modetest: print more about our properties

2012-04-21 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2012/3/29 Eugeni Dodonov eug...@dodonov.net: On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 18:28, Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote: really-small-bikeshedding I don't know if it should go into a separate patch though. But it is aligned to the other formatting patterns you do, and it certainly looks nicer this

[PATCH libdrm 3/5] modetest: print more about our properties

2012-03-30 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 18:28, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni > > In the future we'll have more than just connector properties, so create > a dump_prop function that can handle any property (instead of the > current dump_props function that only handles connector properties). > >

[PATCH libdrm 3/5] modetest: print more about our properties

2012-03-29 Thread Paulo Zanoni
From: Paulo Zanoni In the future we'll have more than just connector properties, so create a dump_prop function that can handle any property (instead of the current dump_props function that only handles connector properties). Also, make this function print a lot more

Re: [PATCH libdrm 3/5] modetest: print more about our properties

2012-03-29 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 18:28, Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote: From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com In the future we'll have more than just connector properties, so create a dump_prop function that can handle any property (instead of the current dump_props function that only