Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpu: host1x: Remove implicit IOMMU backing on client's registration

2019-10-25 Thread Dmitry Osipenko
24.10.2019 14:50, Thierry Reding пишет: > On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 08:37:41PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> On ARM32 we don't want any of the clients device to be backed by the >> implicit domain, simply because we can't afford such a waste on older >> Tegra SoCs that have very few domains

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpu: host1x: Remove implicit IOMMU backing on client's registration

2019-10-25 Thread Dmitry Osipenko
24.10.2019 16:47, Thierry Reding пишет: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 04:35:13PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> 24.10.2019 14:50, Thierry Reding пишет: >>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 08:37:41PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: On ARM32 we don't want any of the clients device to be backed by the

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpu: host1x: Remove implicit IOMMU backing on client's registration

2019-10-25 Thread Dmitry Osipenko
24.10.2019 16:35, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: > 24.10.2019 14:50, Thierry Reding пишет: >> On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 08:37:41PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>> On ARM32 we don't want any of the clients device to be backed by the >>> implicit domain, simply because we can't afford such a waste on older

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpu: host1x: Remove implicit IOMMU backing on client's registration

2019-10-24 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 04:35:13PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > 24.10.2019 14:50, Thierry Reding пишет: > > On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 08:37:41PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > >> On ARM32 we don't want any of the clients device to be backed by the > >> implicit domain, simply because we can't

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpu: host1x: Remove implicit IOMMU backing on client's registration

2019-10-24 Thread Thierry Reding
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 08:37:41PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > On ARM32 we don't want any of the clients device to be backed by the > implicit domain, simply because we can't afford such a waste on older > Tegra SoCs that have very few domains available in total. The recent IOMMU > support

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpu: host1x: Remove implicit IOMMU backing on client's registration

2019-06-24 Thread Dmitry Osipenko
24.06.2019 10:04, Christoph Hellwig пишет: > Don't we have a device tree problem here if there is a domain covering > them? I though we should only pick up an IOMMU for a given device > if DT explicitly asked for that? > There is no specific domain that "covering them". The IOMMU domain is

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpu: host1x: Remove implicit IOMMU backing on client's registration

2019-06-24 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Don't we have a device tree problem here if there is a domain covering them? I though we should only pick up an IOMMU for a given device if DT explicitly asked for that?

[PATCH v1 1/3] gpu: host1x: Remove implicit IOMMU backing on client's registration

2019-06-23 Thread Dmitry Osipenko
On ARM32 we don't want any of the clients device to be backed by the implicit domain, simply because we can't afford such a waste on older Tegra SoCs that have very few domains available in total. The recent IOMMU support addition for the Video Decoder hardware uncovered the problem that an