[PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

2013-07-08 Thread Joonyoung Shim
On 07/05/2013 10:03 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Joonyoung, > > On Friday 05 July 2013 15:30:25 Joonyoung Shim wrote: >> On 07/05/2013 02:38 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote: On 07/04/2013 07:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Friday 28

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

2013-07-08 Thread Joonyoung Shim
On 07/05/2013 10:03 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Joonyoung, On Friday 05 July 2013 15:30:25 Joonyoung Shim wrote: On 07/05/2013 02:38 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote: On 07/04/2013 07:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: On Friday 28 June 2013

[PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

2013-07-05 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote: > On 07/04/2013 07:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> >> Hi Joonyoung, >> >> Thank you for the patches. >> >> On Friday 28 June 2013 14:24:43 Joonyoung Shim wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> This is the second version patchset. >>> >>> GEM CMA

[PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

2013-07-05 Thread Joonyoung Shim
On 07/05/2013 02:38 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joonyoung Shim > wrote: >> On 07/04/2013 07:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> Hi Joonyoung, >>> >>> Thank you for the patches. >>> >>> On Friday 28 June 2013 14:24:43 Joonyoung Shim wrote: Hello, This is

[PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

2013-07-05 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Joonyoung, On Friday 05 July 2013 15:30:25 Joonyoung Shim wrote: > On 07/05/2013 02:38 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote: > >> On 07/04/2013 07:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> On Friday 28 June 2013 14:24:43 Joonyoung Shim wrote: > Hello,

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

2013-07-05 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joonyoung Shim jy0922.s...@samsung.com wrote: On 07/04/2013 07:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Joonyoung, Thank you for the patches. On Friday 28 June 2013 14:24:43 Joonyoung Shim wrote: Hello, This is the second version patchset. GEM CMA supports

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

2013-07-05 Thread Joonyoung Shim
On 07/05/2013 02:38 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joonyoung Shim jy0922.s...@samsung.com wrote: On 07/04/2013 07:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Joonyoung, Thank you for the patches. On Friday 28 June 2013 14:24:43 Joonyoung Shim wrote: Hello, This is the second

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

2013-07-05 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Joonyoung, On Friday 05 July 2013 15:30:25 Joonyoung Shim wrote: On 07/05/2013 02:38 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote: On 07/04/2013 07:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: On Friday 28 June 2013 14:24:43 Joonyoung Shim wrote: Hello, This is

[PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

2013-07-04 Thread Joonyoung Shim
On 07/04/2013 07:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Joonyoung, > > Thank you for the patches. > > On Friday 28 June 2013 14:24:43 Joonyoung Shim wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This is the second version patchset. >> >> GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for >> dma_buf.

[PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

2013-07-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Joonyoung, Thank you for the patches. On Friday 28 June 2013 14:24:43 Joonyoung Shim wrote: > Hello, > > This is the second version patchset. > > GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for > dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

2013-07-04 Thread Joonyoung Shim
On 07/04/2013 07:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Joonyoung, Thank you for the patches. On Friday 28 June 2013 14:24:43 Joonyoung Shim wrote: Hello, This is the second version patchset. GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for dma_buf. We can use prime

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

2013-07-03 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Joonyoung, Thank you for the patches. On Friday 28 June 2013 14:24:43 Joonyoung Shim wrote: Hello, This is the second version patchset. GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit

[PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

2013-06-28 Thread Joonyoung Shim
Hello, This is the second version patchset. GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit 89177644a7b6306e6084a89eab7e290f4bfef397 "drm: add prime helpers", so this patchset is to replace from using GEM CMA

[PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality

2013-06-27 Thread Joonyoung Shim
Hello, This is the second version patchset. GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit 89177644a7b6306e6084a89eab7e290f4bfef397 drm: add prime helpers, so this patchset is to replace from using GEM CMA