On 2018-11-16 10:42, Sean Paul wrote:
From: Sean Paul
I think the intention here was to protect the enc->crtc access, but
that's insufficient to avoid enc->crtc changing. Fortunately we're
already holding the modeset lock when this is called (from
atomic_check), so remove the crtc_lock and add
From: Sean Paul
I think the intention here was to protect the enc->crtc access, but
that's insufficient to avoid enc->crtc changing. Fortunately we're
already holding the modeset lock when this is called (from
atomic_check), so remove the crtc_lock and add a modeset lock check.
While we're at
