On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:28:03PM +0100, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
>
> Den 23.03.2018 16.35, skrev Ville Syrjala:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > mipi_dbi_enable_flush() wants to call the fb->dirty() hook from the
> > bowels of the .atomic_enable() hook. That prevents us from taking the
> > plane mu
On 03/23/2018 10:35 AM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä
mipi_dbi_enable_flush() wants to call the fb->dirty() hook from the
bowels of the .atomic_enable() hook. That prevents us from taking the
plane mutex in fb->dirty() unless we also plumb down the acquire
context.
Instead it seems
Den 23.03.2018 16.35, skrev Ville Syrjala:
From: Ville Syrjälä
mipi_dbi_enable_flush() wants to call the fb->dirty() hook from the
bowels of the .atomic_enable() hook. That prevents us from taking the
plane mutex in fb->dirty() unless we also plumb down the acquire
context.
Instead it seems s
From: Ville Syrjälä
mipi_dbi_enable_flush() wants to call the fb->dirty() hook from the
bowels of the .atomic_enable() hook. That prevents us from taking the
plane mutex in fb->dirty() unless we also plumb down the acquire
context.
Instead it seems simpler to split the fb->dirty() into a tinydrm