On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 6:15 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:08 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 08:07:38AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:40 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 07:09:49PM -0700, Rob
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:08 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 08:07:38AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:40 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 07:09:49PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > > From: Rob Clark
> > > >
> > > > Any
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 08:07:38AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:40 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 07:09:49PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > From: Rob Clark
> > >
> > > Any cross-device sync use-cases *must* use explicit sync. And if there
> > > is
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:40 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 07:09:49PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark
> >
> > Any cross-device sync use-cases *must* use explicit sync. And if there
> > is only a single ring (no-preemption), everything is FIFO order and
> >
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 07:09:49PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark
>
> Any cross-device sync use-cases *must* use explicit sync. And if there
> is only a single ring (no-preemption), everything is FIFO order and
> there is no need to implicit-sync.
>
> Mesa should probably just
From: Rob Clark
Any cross-device sync use-cases *must* use explicit sync. And if there
is only a single ring (no-preemption), everything is FIFO order and
there is no need to implicit-sync.
Mesa should probably just always use MSM_SUBMIT_NO_IMPLICIT, as behavior
is undefined when fences are